The Iowa Alcoholic Beverages Division tracks Iowa and National court court cases that impact the alcohol beverage industry. See the links below for more information. Family Winemakers of California v. Massachusetts Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission The United States Court of Appeals found that the Massachusetts law allowing "small" wineries (all Massachusetts wineries meet the qualification for "small") to ship directly to consumers as well as sell through wholesalers and retailers, while "large" wineries (all of which are out-of-state) can only sell through wholesalers or directly to consumers, but not both, violated the Commerce Clause because it changed the competitive balance between in-state and out-of-state competitors. Court of Appeals Ruling: Winmakers v. Mass ABCC (PDF, 56 KB, opens in a new window) Darrin F. Boger d/b/a Lake Lanes v. Alcoholic Beverages Division, Iowa Department of Commerce The Iowa Court of Appeals found that "scant evidence" (a lack of substantial evidence) existed for the agency's decision that the licensee "allowed or permitted" nudity in his establishment with a naked beer slide, and therefore reversed the agency finding. Court of Appeals Ruling: Lake Lanes v. Iowa ABD (PDF, 120 KB, opens in a new window) State of Iowa v. Aaron Beauford Stohr The Iowa Supreme Court reversed a District Court ruling and affirmed a Court of Appeals ruling that the results of an alcohol breath test are admissible in court if the test is administered properly. Iowa Supreme Court Decision: Iowa v. Stohr (PDF, 102 KB, opens in a new window) Auen v. Alcoholic Beverages Division, Iowa Department of Commerce The Iowa Supreme Court reversed a District Court ruling to affirm the ban on tied-house arrangements, preserving the three-tier system in Iowa. Iowa Supreme Court Decision: Auen v. Iowa ABD (PDF, 68 KB, opens in a new window) City of Okoboji v. Iowa District Court for Dickinson County The Iowa Supreme Court ruled a previous decision issuing an injunction on the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption at a marina should have also included a ban on a range of bar-like activities including parties, hog roasts, and staging bands. Iowa Supreme Court Decision: Okoboji v. Dickinson (PDF, 96 KB, opens in a new window) Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Washington Beer and Wine Wholesalers Association Costco has challenged various laws and regulations in the State of Washington governing the sale and distribution of beer and wine, raising both antitrust and constitutional claims. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld seven of the nine regulations. Summary Judgment 1 (PDF, 106 KB, opens in a new window) Summary Judgment 2 (PDF, 119 KB, opens in a new window) Conclusion (PDF, 983 KB, opens in a new window) U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Decision (PDF, 216 KB, opens in a new window) Granholm v. Heald The United States Supreme Court struck down Michigan and New York laws that prohibited out-of-state wineries from shipping wine directly to consumers in their states. As a result, similar laws are currently being challenged in states across the country. United States Supreme Court Decision: Granholm v. Heald (PDF, 297 KB, opens in a new window) Iowa Grocery Industry Association v. City of Des Moines The City of Des Moines appealed a district court decision declaring a municipal ordinance which imposed administrative fees on liquor licenses and beer and wine permits illegal. Supreme Court of Iowa Decision: Iowa Grocery v. Des Moines (PDF, 134 KB, opens in a new window)